Interesting Charter Application to BAE Systems Case

September 29th, 2008 • Australia, Human Rights, Melbourne

Gans takes us through a wild ride of Charter interpretation in VCAT over the BAE Systems Case, which dealt with the USA’s discriminatory national security hiring policy. So we’ve got a badly drafted Charter, being applied in a terrible manner. What good can come of this? I particularly like how VEOHRC submission to VCAT supported BAE’s discrimination by reading the Charter wrong.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Related posts:

  1. Gans Quote on Victorian Judges and the Charter
  2. Human Rights Charter limiting rights?
  3. Gans on the Charter Moot
  4. New blog on the Victorian Charter of Human Rights
  5. Australia preparing ICJ case against Iran

Tags: ,

Trackback URI.



Leave a Reply

Formatting: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Other Entries

About me

My name is Devon Whittle and welcome to my website. I'm a recent law grad, currently interning in London.

If you have any questions/comments just email me at devonwhittle@gmail.com, I’d love to hear from you. Also, you should follow me on twitter here.




My Twitter

  • Could not connect to Twitter

Recommended Reading

Popular posts

Some links

  • No Blogroll Links