Gans on admissible evidence in Australia

Jeremy Gans is hilarious as always when reflecting on the approach of judges to evidence in Australia:He said that he would have done the usual Australian judicial thing in relation to the question of excluding the evidence: letting it in on the grounds that the police didn’t kill anyone and Darby is a nasty moustache-twirling villain.

Popularity: unranked [?]

Related posts:

  1. Gans on Australian Human Rights Legislation
  2. Gans on FuelWatch
  3. Gans on the Charter Moot
  4. Gans Quote on Victorian Judges and the Charter
  5. Sweden's #1, Australia is #14, USA is #16


Leave a Reply

Formatting: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Other Entries

About me

My name is Devon Whittle and welcome to my website. I'm a recent law grad, currently interning in London.

If you have any questions/comments just email me at devonwhittle@gmail.com, I’d love to hear from you. Also, you should follow me on twitter here.




My Twitter

  • Could not connect to Twitter